.

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Briefly describe Hofstede's taxonomy of cross-cultural diversity. To what extent do you believe Hofstede's taxonomy accurately describes the national culture that you were raised in?

Brief Theory Review There four dimensions atomic number 18 involve in the Hofstedes studies (Hill, 2003).          military vehemence distance In adept country, high cistron distance glosss could let inequalities beget everywhere time into inequalities of post and wealth. By contrast, lower agent distance tried to chance down such inequalities in union as oft as possible.         The various(prenominal)ism versus collectivism It focuses on the degree the society reinforces individual or collective, achievement and hearty consanguinitys. In the individualism society, the ties among individuals were loose and peoples achievement and independence could be valued. Compared with that, in the collectivism society, the relationship between individuals was tight. wholly the collective types such as family were emphasized by the members.          vacillation avoidance This dimension measured the consummation that people with different cultures could lug through a amplitude on job security, locomote patterns, seclusion benefits, and so on.          masculinity versus femininity It focuses on the traditional manful exert role nonplus of male achievement, control, and power describing the 2 sexual practice roles and their relationship in workplaces and analyzes the effect on job.         Long line versus terse term orientation It focus on the degree the society embraces, prospicient term devotion to traditional, in front thinking values. Hofstedes subject neighborhood in mainland China First, culture is non a constant; it evolves over time.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
As similar as former(a) countries, Chinese culture is in like manner experiencing its transplant with the extent of Chinese economic transforming since the expiry of 1970s (Hofstede, 1994). Hofstsdes was conducted in 1970s that told us in ecumenic way some differences between cultures. Many of Hofstedes decision are consistent with amount Western stereotypes about ethnic differences. Therefore, it could not totally be suitable for todays Chinese situation. Second, Hofstede assumes at that place is a one-to-one equipoise between culture and the nation-state, but, China also has more than one culture as former(a) countries. For... If you inadequacy to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment