Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and H

Comparing Knowledge in Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and Humes An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Rationalists would claim that experience comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The dispute between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, bottomland be examined in order to determine how these schools determine the source of knowledge. The distinguishing chemical element that determines the perspective on the shewation of knowledge is the concept of the divine. Descartes is a bill example of a rationalist. Descartes begins his Meditations on First Philosophy by disbelieve his senses in the first meditation. From time to time I Descartes have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us sluice once(Descartes 12). In the second meditat ion, Descartes begins to rebuild the world he stone-broke down in the first meditation by micturateing cogito ergo wedlock with the aid of natural light. It is with this intuition that the cogito is established, from the cogito, intellect, from the intellect, knowledge thus knowledge has been delimitate in this world that Descartes is constructing from scratch. Descartes uses the fact that he is a thinking function to establish the existence of other things in the world with the cosmological and ontological arguments, as well as a meditation on legality and falsity. So now I seem to be able to get it down as a general rule that whatever I perceive very clearly and distinctly is true (Descartes 24). Descartes only utilizes his perceptions to establish ideas of the things t... ...traced back to original impressions.The source of knowledge is not a exit that is universally agreed upon. To rationalists, who usually have a sense of the divine, inbred ideas give them cause t o base knowledge in reason, being derived from ideas. To empiricists, who do not hold innate ideas to be valid, knowledge is unearthed through the senses, derived from observations. The battlefront of a concept of the divine is the deciding factor of whether knowledge originates from the senses or the ideas.Works CitedAristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. Hackett Publishing Company Indianapolis. 1985.Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by John Cottingham. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. 1996.Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. 2nd edition. Hackett Publishing Indianapolis. 1993.