Molecular Genetics: Catching the Criminal Using Electrophoresis

Introduction A specimen of deoxyribonucleic acid found in a abomination motion picture was provided along with five umbrageouss. Their DNA was then bear upon using restriction enzymes and Agarose Gel Electrophoresis. The objective of this lab was to match a evils DNA to a abuse scene using restriction enzymes EcoRI and Pstl with Agarose gelatine electrophoresis. Restriction enzymes cut DNA at a specific shew pair site recognized by the enzyme, which then turns one ace strand of DNA into many fragmented strands of DNA.EcoRI recognizes and cuts the palindromic paper pair chronological sequence GATTC while Pstl recognizes and cuts the palindromic base pair sequence CTGCAG. Agarose gel electrophoreses separates these fragmented DNA by their surface. The negatively charged DNA moves through the Agarose gel to the positively charged end of the gel. The smaller fragments move through the gel much quickly allowing a linear view of the fragmented DNA when the do work is comple te. Since each individuals DNA will be cut into different coat fragments when restriction enzymes are applied we can match one of the suspects to the crime scene DNA sample.This process enables an individuals DNA to be matched, much like a fingerprint, to a sample of unknown DNA. Methods An enzyme meld of EcoRl and Pstl was added 10 microliters at a time to the crime scene sample and suspect samples one through five each containing 20 microliters of DNA. A new pipet was used for each transfer of the enzyme mix to go through that there was no cross contamination of the suspects. To guarantee the enzyme reacts with the DNA the hexad samples mixed with enzyme were then centrifuged.You can read also King v CogdonThe samples were incubated at 37 C for 45 minutes, after incubation 5 microliters of dye were added to each sample. During this time an Agarose gel was cast using an 8 well(p) comb. The Agarose gel was placed in the electrophoresis chamber with the well at the cathode end and 275mL of electrophoresis buffer was added. In the first well 10 microliters of Hindlll DNA marker was added. This marker was provided dye. In the following come up 20 microliters of each sample was added, Table 1 provides the highroad information. The volts were crop at 120 Volts and the sample was electrophoresed for 30 minutes.After the gel was electrophoresed it was transferred into a container and dyed with Fast Blast DNA stain so the DNA fragments could extend visible to the eye. Results Figure 1 below shows the samples once they have been dyed. To the bleak eye it would appear that the closest match to Lane 2 (the crime scene) would be Lane 4 (Suspect 2) but to verify this conclusion you neediness to calculate the size of the gangs. To compare the samples the size of each marker band was measured from the well to the band in mm and charted with the given size of each band as shown in Graph 1.In the first newspaper column of Table 2, Hindll size in base pairs was provided, to find the approximate size of the other samples the outstrip of each band was plugged in as an x-value to the y=-142x+13214 equation found using excel on the best suffer line on Graph 1. Comparing the crime scene column to suspects one through five it was found that Suspect 3 was the criminal. His DNA fragments were of similar size and travelled a similar distance through the electrophoresis gel. Discussion- There is a pretty serious misplay with the calculations of size in base pairs as presented in Table 2.Some of the base pair lengths were found to be negative numbers which does not mightily correlate to the proposed size of the bands. This break was most likely to have happened in the graphing of the marker. In the results it was discussed that Suspect 3 is most likely to be the criminal but this result was found by disregarding the negative values. If the error was corrected and the correct size measurements were found the suspect found to be the criminal may have been different.Since the values for size had an error in them the criminal could not be positively identified. Conclusion- In this lab it was build that pairing restriction enzymes with gel electrophoresis makes it possible to match a DNA sample to an individual. Applying the restriction enzyme cuts each DNA sequence into a unique size and amounts of fragments for each sample. This unique combination of sequences is what makes it possible to rate the fragments through an electrophoresis gel that separates the fragments into a unique fingerprint. Although a suspect was not properly identified to the crime scene sample, it is clear how it would be possible to identify a criminal. Table 1- This table lists each lane of the electrophoresis well and what sample was pipeted into it and how much of each sample in microliters. Lane one starts on the left hand of the well. Graph 1- The graph provides a scatter plot of the marker in lane 1, in a log scale, linear fit with a best fit l ine through it. The equation for slope found was y=-142x+13214.