Christian Perspectives on Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicides Research Paper

Christian Perspectives on Euthanasia and doctor Assisted Suicides - Research Paper ExampleSince then, the ethics of the practice has evolved, and so have the reasons for proscription. Nowadays, the proscription is found more upon practical concerns then scriptural 1s concerns such as the introduction of a slippery cant the possibility that the person might be cured and miss his or her chance for this cure and the pauperism to create a culture of vitality that values everybody in society, pull down the infirm and terminally ill. Still, the doctrine remains that God has sovereignty over life and death, and man cannot usurp this. St. Thomas Aquinas was wholeness of the first religious figures to advocate this, and the traditional Christian proscription for the practice has been based upon this ever since. Although or so individual Christians may take issue with the official church teachings on the subject, for a variety of reasons, in the end the practice should be banned be cause of the practical concerns listed above. Discussion According to Fontana (2002), there have been a variety of traditions through by the ages concerning the ethics of euthanasia. For instance, in Ancient Greece, Hemlock, a common poison, was made available for individuals who sought after a good death, after an appeal to a tribunal. In fact, ending ones life was a festive occasion for the elderly and the infirm, as they drank ceremonial poison at a counterpane that honored their lives. It was similar in ancient Rome (Fontana, 2002, p. 147). Of course, these practices were prior to Christianity, and the advent of Christianity caused these euthanasia practices to be illegalise (Fontana, 2002, p. 147). In particular, St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine declared such practice a great sin. However, an increase in laypersonism during the Renaissance period and Enlightenment in the 18th Century caused a resurgence of Greco-Roman beliefs regarding the practice, and this greater pe rmissiveness continued into the 19th Century when social philosophers advocated for the practice. However, even though there was great tolerance for the practice, it was not entirely accepted as it was in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, because the church still had near(prenominal) sway, and, as the church believed the practice to be sinful, this had some impact on society and the laws regarding euthanasia even during the Renaissance and Enlightenment (Fontana, 2002, p. 147). Euthanasia may be either involuntary or voluntary. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when there is brain death or the person is otherwise incapacitated. In that case, especially if there is some kind of directive from the person, in that he or she signed a living will or a Do Not Resuscitate order, then that person will be allowed to die. Voluntary euthanasia, however, is more active and involved, therefore more controversial. Voluntary euthanasia is when an individual who is of clear mind chooses to end his or her life with assistance (Nayernouri, 2011, p. 54). Nayernouri (2011) further delineates the practice of euthanasia from suicide. As she explains, suicide is an act that one takes by oneself, without assistance, and this is not as controversial as euthanasia as the act of suicide is presumably ones right, although the worlds religions, including Christianity, Islam and Judaism view this act to be one of great sin (Nayernouri, 2011, p. 54). The secular rationale against euthanasia are that the patient may be treated therapeutically for depression or pain, which are the major reasons why individuals choose euthanasia. It is for this reason that the American Medical Association (AMA) has come out against the practice. The AMAs stance on euthanasia is inconsistent with its other stances which conflict with the traditional pro-life views regarding spontaneous abortion and