Leadership approach of Martin Luther King

Question: Discuss about the Leadership approach of Martin Luther King. Answer: Introduction: Leadership is one of the most critical dimensions of an organisation that tends to manage the resource utilisation and governs the manpower to achieve the organisational objectives. Of note, there exist several factors that have the potential to shape the leaders. The important factors in this consideration include ethics, social responsibility, stakeholders perspective, and the perseverance of society (Christensen, Mackey, Whetten, 2014). The first lesion from leadership of Dr. King, one must have total commitment to the causes. Taking reference of Martin Luther King, leader must value the process, people, and the mechanism with which the work procedure is managed for an efficient outcome (Voegtlin, Patzer Scherer, 2012). As a leader, Dr. King had the ability to recognise individual employees capabilities, motive them for the acquisition of knowledge, to focus on risk identification, and offering sustainable opportunities to the employee for resigning their competency level. The corporate social responsibility is another fundamental element of leadership trait that is reflective of the visionary approach and decision making. Kings effort for supporting civil rights, movement against racial discrimination, and dismantling segregation are reflective of these facts (Chappell, 2014). His ethical approach is reflective with this speech, where he seeks equalities for white and Negros. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, When will you be satisfied? We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. Likewise for corporate social responsibility, he call people to act in accord with their highest values during the civil right movements. His action for inclusive change for the disadvantaged African-Americans is reflective of such action where he advocated equal opportunity for school, corporate and social values. Leadership lessons from Dr. Kings apprach clearly indicates about what is required for the organisational success and what approach must be adopted for bringing effectiveness, can be learned with Kings speech, I had a dream rationalise this leadership approach (Crawford, 2013). Factors like cost effectiveness, timeliness management, resource procurement and purchase, market analysis, and highlighting the facts with evidence are common practices that can be managed with decision making. These lessons can be learned with leadership lesson from Dr. King in which he dictated that disrupting the status quo is indeed required for managing change (Crawford, 2013). The perspective of society can also be implemented to the work practices with a similar notation in which listening to people (inside and outside to organisation), anticipating the change required in the market, and designing core synergy that can have a positive impact on the environment as well as society. Overall, with the definite prospect of managing people, it apparently becomes possible for a Dr. King to achieve objectives and maintain a good public image as a leader. Leadership Approach The leaders must have an integrated work approach that must be widespread of dimensions like regulation, marketing prospect, market force analysis, technological implementation, social attitude shifting, economic turbulence, and use of information technology. In particular, Dr. Kings approach of implementation include a provision like evidence-based practice which further is evidenced to process in the form of shared decision making. The rationale behind these measures is to manage negotiation, accuracy in decision making, and making a balance for individual values. Dr. King uses both motivational tools as well as utilisation of evaluation provision to maintain the effectiveness of work procedure (Eisenbei Brodbeck, 2014). In order to manage the continuity of workflow, Dr. King use to communicate the change widely and then attempts to remove the obstacles with empowerment of people to act. Dr. King also tends to interpret the signs of employee and weigh the risk, and uses motivational tools to reward and encouraging people to bring more innovation (Crawford, 2013). The most common practice of leadership that can overcome the challenges of inefficiency includes the development of followers and strengthening the teamwork by the empowerment of individual employment. His followers have the dignity and freedom for their spirits. Likewise, Dr. King group also have the thought that self-centred men will torn down, whereas other-cantered men will build themselves up. With these actions, he bridged the communication gap, which separates the struggling people from being ruled by insensitive and greedy masters (Verbos Humphries, 2014). Dr. King use to build mutual beneficial alliance with local ministers and community representatives which reflect above statements. Similarly, according to Dr. King, it is very essential to identify the risk and weigh them, such that resolution of conflict and any issue related to work can be managed in time. (Christensen, Mackey, Whetten, 2014). The factors that help Dr. King to manage change include approach of the positive emotional attractor, ensuring people for support, using repetition to bring excellence, and applying for after-action reviews like feedback and survey outcomes (Verbos Humphries, 2014). Note that while managing cultural diversity, especially in a team where members are from the diverse cultural (racial) background, Dr. King maintain accurate communication, interaction, and motivational tools (Harvey, Parry Vorbach, 2014). References: Chappell, D. L. (2014). Waking from the Dream: The Struggle for Civil Rights in the Shadow of Martin Luther King, Jr. Random House. Christensen, L. J., Mackey, A., Whetten, D. (2014). Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 164-178. Crawford, V. L. (2013). " In an Inescapable Network of Mutuality": Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Globalization of an Ethical Ideal. L. V. Baldwin, P. R. Dekar (Eds.). Wipf and Stock Publishers. Eisenbei, S. A., Brodbeck, F. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 343-359. Harvey, W. S., Parry, S., Vorbach, P. (2014). Managing Leadership and Cultural Change at Beak and Johnston: A Work in Progress. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 33(6), 43-50. Miska, C., Hilbe, C., Mayer, S. (2014). Reconciling different views on responsible leadership: A rationality-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 349-360. Verbos, A. K., Humphries, M. (2014). A native American relational ethic: an indigenous perspective on teaching human responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 1-9. Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 1-16. Waldman, D. A., Balven, R. M. (2014). Responsible leadership: Theoretical issues and research directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 224-234.